1.
Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’ thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511–558. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
2.
Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J.-S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
3.
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 5–23). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_2
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
4.
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
5.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
6.
Cañadas, M. C., Brizuela, B. M., & Blanton, M. (2016). Second graders articulating ideas about linear functional relationships. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.004
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
7.
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–705). Information Age.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
8.
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. In P. Cobb (Ed.), Learning mathematics: Constructivist and interactionist theories of mathematical development (pp. 31–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2057-1_2
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
9.
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/749228
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
10.
Cooper, T. J., & Warren, E. (2011). Years 2 to 6 students’ ability to generalise: Models, representations and theory for teaching and learning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 187–214). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_12
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
11.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
12.
Demetriou, A., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). The functional and developmental organization of cognitive developmental sequences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 209–242. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X43256
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
13.
Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Gravemeijer, K., Boon, P., & Reed, H. (2013). Design research in mathematics education: The case of an ICT-rich learning arrangement for the concept of function. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 425–446). SLO: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
14.
Dubinsky, E., & Harel, G. (1992). The nature of the process conception of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 85–106). Mathematical Association of America.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
15.
Eisenberg, T. (1992). On the development of a sense for functions. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 153–174). Mathematical Association of America.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
16.
Ellis, A. B. (2011). Algebra in the middle school: Developing functional relationships through quantitative reasoning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 215–238). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_13
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
17.
El Mouhayar, R. (2018). Trends of progression of student level of reasoning and generalization in numerical and figural reasoning approaches in pattern generalization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9821-8.
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
18.
Ferrara, F., & Sinclair, N. (2016). An early algebra approach to pattern generalisation: Actualising the virtual through words, gestures and toilet paper. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9674-3
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
19.
Greeno, J. G. (1988). The situated activities of learning and knowing mathematics. In M. Behr, C. Lacampagne, & M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the PME-NA (pp. 481–521). International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
20.
Jurdak, M. E., & El Mouhayar, R. R. (2014). Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9494-2
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
21.
Kane, M. T. (2016). Validity as the evaluation of the claims based on test scores. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1156645
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
22.
Kieran, C. (2018). Seeking, using, and expressing structure in numbers and numerical operations: A fundamental path to developing early algebraic thinking. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 79–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_4
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
23.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
24.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
25.
Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bernarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1732-3_5
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
26.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
27.
Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
28.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Authors.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
29.
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
30.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
31.
Papic, M. M., Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0237
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
32.
Piaget, J., Grize, J.-B., Szeminska, A., & Bang, V. (1977). Epistemology and psychology of functions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9321-7
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
33.
Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 303–322). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_17
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
34.
Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 3–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_1
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
35.
Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 297–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9222-0
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
36.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
37.
Siemon, D., Beswick, K., Brady, K., Clark, J., Faragher, R., & Warren, E. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Foundations to middle years. Oxford University Press.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
38.
Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133–160). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-6
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
39.
Stephens, A. C., Ellis, A. B., Blanton, M., & Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebraic thinking in the elementary and middle grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 386–420). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
40.
Stephens, A. C., Fonger, N., Strachota, S., Isler, I., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M. (2017). A learning progression for elementary students’ functional thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19(3), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
41.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). How to design and create an effective survey/questionnaire; A step by step guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(4), 37–41.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
42.
Tanışlı, D. (2011). Functional thinking ways in relation to linear function tables of elementary school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.08.001
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
43.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
44.
Tesch, R. (2013). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Routledge.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
45.
Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
46.
Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. P. Shulte & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K12: 1988 yearbook (pp. 8–19). National Council of Mathematics.
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
47.
Vollrath, H.-J. (1986). Search strategies as indicators of functional thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311326
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
48.
Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2005). Introducing functional thinking in Year 2: A case study of early algebra teaching. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2005.6.2.5
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
49.
Warren, E. A., Cooper, T. J., & Lamb, J. T. (2006). Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.006
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
50.
Wilkie, K. J., & Clarke, D. M. (2016). Developing students’ functional thinking in algebra through different visualisations of a growing pattern’s structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0146-y
- Crossref
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation